CLASS 12 · CHAPTER 5 · MAGNETISM
Magnetism and Matter
A compass needle always settles pointing north, never south, even though both directions are places where the magnetic torque on it is exactly zero. Rotate the bar magnet below and find out why only one of those zeros ever actually holds.
Watch it happen
The torque here is pulling the magnet the rest of the way toward θ = 0°, where it will eventually settle.
Drag θ from 0° up to 180°. Torque climbs from zero, peaks at 90°, then falls back to zero again at 180°, the same value it had at the start. But the equilibrium readout flips from Stable to Unstable between those two zeros: the torque curve alone can’t tell you which is which, you have to look at how potential energy U behaves right around each point.
Where the formula comes from
A bar magnet behaves, from the outside, just like a current-carrying solenoid, the equivalent solenoid picture. A solenoid of turns, each carrying current and enclosing area , has a magnetic dipole moment:
A bar magnet is assigned the same quantity , pointing from its south pole to its north pole, precisely because it produces the same external field pattern and obeys the same torque law as that equivalent solenoid.
Placed in a uniform external field at angle to , the two forces on the (equal and opposite) poles form a couple. Each force has magnitude (pole strength times field), separated by a perpendicular lever arm , giving:
Potential energy is defined by the work needed to rotate the dipole from a reference angle (conventionally , where ) to angle , which integrates the torque above:
With this sign convention, is lowest (most negative) when and point the same way, exactly where the simulation above reads Stable.
Where the shortcut stops working
Both and give , so at both. It’s tempting to read “zero torque” as “nothing is happening here, so it must just sit still”, and treat the two positions as interchangeable. They are not. Zero torque only describes this exact instant; it says nothing about what happens the moment something disturbs the angle even slightly, which, in the real world, something always does.
To tell the two apart, look at potential energy, not torque, just either side of each point. Near , is at a minimum, nudge a little either way and rises, meaning the system has to do work to move away from there. A restoring torque appears the instant you leave , and it always points back toward it. That is exactly what a stable equilibrium means.
Near , is at a maximum instead. Nudge slightly away from 180° and falls, the dipole can lower its energy by continuing to rotate away, not by returning. The torque that appears doesn’t restore , it accelerates the dipole away from it, all the way around to , never back to . That is an unstable equilibrium: a true zero-torque point that no real disturbance leaves alone.
This is precisely why a compass needle always settles pointing to magnetic north and never to magnetic south, even though “pointing south” is also, momentarily, a position of zero torque. The rule to remember: zero torque is necessary for equilibrium, but you must check whether sits at a minimum (stable) or a maximum (unstable) before calling it one.
Apply it under exam conditions
Q1. A bar magnet of dipole moment 0.8 A·m² is placed at 30° to a uniform field of 0.5 T. Find the torque on it.
Q2. A dipole sits at θ = 2° in one experiment and θ = 178° in another, both in the same uniform field. Both report a torque reading close to zero. Which one is in a stable equilibrium, and why?
θ = 2° is close to θ = 0°, where is at its minimum: any further nudge raises , so a restoring torque pulls it back toward 0°. This is the stable one.
θ = 178° is close to θ = 180°, where is at its maximum: any further nudge lowers , so the torque pushes it further away, around to 0°, not back to 180°. This one is unstable, despite reading almost the same (near-zero) torque as the first.
Quick answers
If torque is zero at both θ = 0° and θ = 180°, how can one be stable and the other not?+
Zero torque only means the magnet isn't being pushed to rotate right now, it says nothing about what happens if it's nudged. At θ = 0°, a small nudge creates a restoring torque that pushes the magnet back, U is at a minimum there, so it's stable. At θ = 180°, a small nudge creates a torque that grows, pushing it further away, U is at a maximum there, so it's unstable. Zero torque is necessary for equilibrium but doesn't by itself tell you whether that equilibrium holds.
Why doesn't a compass needle ever settle pointing toward magnetic south?+
It technically could, in principle, if it were placed exactly at θ = 180° with zero disturbance, since torque really is zero there. But θ = 180° is unstable: any real nudge, air currents, friction in the pivot, Earth's field not being perfectly uniform, grows instead of fading, and the needle swings all the way around to θ = 0° (pointing north), never back to south. That's the same reason a pencil balanced exactly on its tip falls, a perfect equilibrium that no real-world perturbation leaves alone.
Is the magnetic dipole moment M the same as the magnetic field B?+
No. M (unit A·m²) is a property of the magnet itself, how strong a 'magnetic dipole' it is, built from its loop current and area (or its pole strength and length). B (unit T) is the external field the magnet sits in, produced by some other source (a solenoid, the Earth, another magnet). Torque and potential energy both depend on the product of the two, τ = MB sin θ and U = −MB cos θ, but doubling M and doubling B have completely different physical meanings.
Why is a bar magnet treated as 'equivalent' to a current-carrying solenoid?+
Because, from outside, their magnetic fields look the same: both produce a dipole-like field with a north-seeking and south-seeking end, and both experience the identical torque and potential-energy laws in an external field. This equivalence is what justifies defining a bar magnet's dipole moment the same way as a loop's, M = NIA for the solenoid, and treating the bar magnet as 'built from' amperian current loops rather than from any actual magnetic charge.
Related concepts
Physics doesn’t stay inside chapter boundaries. Neither should you.
Moving Charges and Magnetism
Crank up a charged particle's speed and watch its orbit grow, while the time for one full lap never changes at all.
ElectromagnetismElectromagnetic Induction
Push a sliding rod faster and the induced force pushes back harder, eating your extra effort twice as fast as you'd guess.
