Physics by Lamhi: Not Your Boring Physics

CLASS 12 · CHAPTER 12 · MODERN PHYSICS

DETAILED NOTES

Atoms

The complete chapter, section by section: Rutherford's nuclear model, the distance of closest approach in alpha-particle scattering, and why the model failed; Bohr's postulates; a step-by-step derivation of the orbit radii, electron speeds, and energy levels from those postulates; the energy level diagram with its shrinking gaps; and the spectral series that diagram explains, with original worked examples and solved NCERT exercises.

12.1 Rutherford’s Nuclear Model & Closest Approach

Rutherford’s alpha-particle scattering experiment showed that an atom’s positive charge and almost all of its mass are concentrated in a tiny, dense nucleus, with electrons orbiting it at a comparatively huge distance, mostly empty space.

12.1.1 Distance of closest approach

In the experiment itself (Geiger and Marsden, 1911), a narrow beam of alpha particles, helium nuclei carrying charge +2e+2e, was fired at a very thin gold foil. Almost all of them went straight through, but about 1 in 8000 was turned back through more than 90°. The ones that bounce almost straight back are the ones aimed dead centre at a nucleus, a head-on approach, and they let us put an actual number on how small the nucleus has to be.

Follow one such alpha particle, mass mαm_\alpha, starting far away with speed vv, so with kinetic energy K=12mαv2K = \tfrac{1}{2}m_\alpha v^2. The target nucleus has charge +Ze+Ze, where ZZ is its atomic number (79 for gold), so the two repel. As the alpha particle closes in, that repulsion slows it down, until at some separation dd it stops completely for an instant, and is then pushed straight back the way it came. That turning point is the distance of closest approach.

A heavy nucleus like gold’s is about 50 times heavier than an alpha particle, so treat it as staying put. Then the total mechanical energy (kinetic plus electrostatic potential) is conserved the whole way in, and all we need to do is compare it at the start and at the turning point.

At the start, the separation is so large it might as well be infinite, so the electrostatic potential energy is zero and the energy is all kinetic:

Estart=K+0=12mαv2E_{\text{start}} = K + 0 = \tfrac{1}{2}m_\alpha v^2

At the turning point, the alpha particle is momentarily at rest, so its kinetic energy is zero and all of the energy has become the potential energy kq1q2/rkq_1q_2/r of the two charges q1=+2eq_1 = +2e and q2=+Zeq_2 = +Ze at separation dd, where k=1/4πε0≈8.988×109 N m2C−2k = 1/4\pi\varepsilon_0 \approx 8.988\times10^9\text{ N m}^2\text{C}^{-2}:

Eturn=0+k(2e)(Ze)d=2kZe2dE_{\text{turn}} = 0 + \dfrac{k(2e)(Ze)}{d} = \dfrac{2kZe^2}{d}

Energy conservation sets the two equal:

K=2kZe2dK = \dfrac{2kZe^2}{d}

Multiply both sides by dd, then divide both sides by KK:

Distance of closest approach
d=2kZe2K\textcolor{#e08a1e}{d} = \dfrac{2kZe^2}{K}

or, writing out K=12mαv2K = \tfrac{1}{2}m_\alpha v^2 (and dividing by 12mαv2\tfrac{1}{2}m_\alpha v^2 is the same as multiplying by 2/mαv22/m_\alpha v^2):

d=2kZe212mαv2=4kZe2mαv2d = \dfrac{2kZe^2}{\tfrac{1}{2}m_\alpha v^2} = \dfrac{4kZe^2}{m_\alpha v^2}

Reading it: a more energetic alpha particle gets closer (d∝1/Kd \propto 1/K), and a more highly charged nucleus holds it further off (d∝Zd \propto Z). An alpha particle that is not aimed exactly head-on gets deflected sideways before it can come this close, so dd is the nearest any alpha particle of that energy can reach. And since the alpha particle turns round without ever touching the nucleus, with Coulomb’s law holding all the way in, the nucleus must be smaller than dd: the distance of closest approach is an upper limit on the size of the nucleus.

Worked example

A 6.00 MeV alpha particle aimed head-on at a lead nucleus

An alpha particle with kinetic energy 6.00 MeV heads straight at a lead nucleus (Z = 82). How close does it get before it stops and turns back?

First convert the energy to joules (1 MeV = 10⁶ eV, and 1 eV = 1.602×10⁻¹⁹ J):

K=6.00×106×1.602×10−19=9.612×10−13 JK = 6.00\times10^{6}\times1.602\times10^{-19} = 9.612\times10^{-13}\text{ J}

Then substitute into d=2kZe2/Kd = 2kZe^2/K:

d=2(8.988×109)(82)(1.602×10−19)29.612×10−13=3.783×10−269.612×10−13d = \dfrac{2(8.988\times10^{9})(82)(1.602\times10^{-19})^2}{9.612\times10^{-13}} = \dfrac{3.783\times10^{-26}}{9.612\times10^{-13}}d≈3.94×10−14 m=39.4 fmd \approx \textcolor{#e08a1e}{3.94\times10^{-14}\text{ m} = 39.4\text{ fm}}

(1 fm, a femtometre or “fermi”, is 10⁻¹⁵ m.) A handy check that avoids powers of ten: ke2≈1.44 MeV fmke^2 \approx 1.44\text{ MeV fm}, so with KK in MeV, d=2Z(1.44)/K=2(82)(1.44)/6.00≈39.4 fmd = 2Z(1.44)/K = 2(82)(1.44)/6.00 \approx 39.4\text{ fm}, the same answer.

A lead nucleus actually has a radius of only about 7.1 fm, so the alpha particle turns back while still more than five times that distance from the centre: it never touches the nucleus at all.

12.1.2 Why the nuclear model could not be the whole story

This model had a fatal flaw: by classical electromagnetism, an electron orbiting the nucleus is constantly accelerating (circular motion), and an accelerating charge must radiate electromagnetic energy continuously. That radiated energy would come out of the electron’s orbital energy, so the electron should spiral inward and crash into the nucleus in a tiny fraction of a second. Real atoms are stable, so classical physics was missing something.

12.2 Bohr’s Postulates

12.2.1 Stationary orbits (quantised angular momentum)

Electrons can only occupy certain special circular orbits in which they do not radiate energy, called stationary states. These orbits are exactly the ones where the orbital angular momentum is an integer multiple of h/2πh/2\pi:

Quantisation of angular momentum
L=mvr=nh2π,n=1,2,3,…L = mvr = \dfrac{nh}{2\pi}, \quad n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots

12.2.2 Photon emission and absorption

An atom emits or absorbs electromagnetic radiation only when an electron jumps from one stationary state to another, and the photon’s energy exactly equals the difference between the two states’ energies:

Bohr frequency condition
hν=Ei−Efh\nu = E_i - E_f

A jump to a lower energy state (smaller n) releases a photon (emission); a jump to a higher state (larger n) requires absorbing a photon of exactly that energy.

12.3 Deriving the Orbit Radius & Energy

Bohr’s postulates say which orbits are allowed, but not yet how big they are or how much energy the electron has in each. Both follow from combining two ingredients, one step at a time: ordinary Newtonian mechanics for an electron going round in a circle, and the angular momentum condition from §12.2.1. To keep the algebra readable, use the same k=1/4πε0k = 1/4\pi\varepsilon_0 as in §12.1.1, plus one more standard shorthand, ℏ=h/2π\hbar = h/2\pi (read “h-bar”), so that the quantisation condition reads simply:

Quantisation condition (§12.2.1)
mvr=nℏmvr = n\hbar

Throughout, the hydrogen nucleus is a single proton with charge +e+e, taken to stay fixed (it is about 1836 times heavier than the electron), and the electron has charge −e-e and mass mm.

12.3.1 Step 1: The force balance

At separation rr, the proton pulls the electron towards itself with a Coulomb force of magnitude k⋅e⋅e/r2=ke2/r2k\cdot e\cdot e/r^2 = ke^2/r^2. To move in a circle of radius rr at speed vv, the electron needs a net inward (centripetal) force of exactly mv2/rmv^2/r. The Coulomb pull is the only force acting on it, so it has to supply all of that:

ke2r2=mv2r\dfrac{ke^2}{r^2} = \dfrac{mv^2}{r}

Multiply both sides by r2r^2 to clear the fractions:

Force balance
mv2r=ke2mv^2r = ke^2

On its own, this is pure classical physics and allows any radius: pick an rr, and some speed satisfies it. It is the quantisation condition that singles out particular radii, and the next step brings the two together.

12.3.2 Step 2: Solving for the speed and the radius

The key move is to spot that the left-hand side of the force balance, mv2rmv^2r, is just mvrmvr multiplied by one more factor of vv, and mvrmvr is exactly the quantity the postulate fixes at nℏn\hbar:

mv2r=(mvr) v=(nℏ) vmv^2r = (mvr)\,v = (n\hbar)\,v

So the force balance becomes

nℏ v=ke2n\hbar\,v = ke^2

and dividing both sides by nℏn\hbar gives the speed in the n-th orbit:

Electron speed in the n-th orbit
vn=ke2nℏ\textcolor{#e08a1e}{v_n} = \dfrac{ke^2}{n\hbar}

For the radius, go back to the quantisation condition and rearrange it for rr (divide both sides by mvmv), then put in the speed just found:

rn=nℏm vn=nℏm×1vn=nℏm×nℏke2r_n = \dfrac{n\hbar}{m\,v_n} = \dfrac{n\hbar}{m}\times\dfrac{1}{v_n} = \dfrac{n\hbar}{m}\times\dfrac{n\hbar}{ke^2}

(dividing by vn=ke2/nℏv_n = ke^2/n\hbar is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal, nℏ/ke2n\hbar/ke^2). Multiplying the two fractions together:

Radius of the n-th orbit
rn=n2ℏ2mke2\textcolor{#e08a1e}{r_n} = \dfrac{n^2\hbar^2}{mke^2}

So the speed falls as 1/n1/n (the electron in the second orbit moves at half the speed it has in the first), while the radius grows as n2n^2. The textbook writes the same result without the shorthands; putting ℏ=h/2π\hbar = h/2\pi and k=1/4πε0k = 1/4\pi\varepsilon_0 back in:

rn=n2m(h2π)24πε0e2=n2h2ε0πme2r_n = \dfrac{n^2}{m}\left(\dfrac{h}{2\pi}\right)^2\dfrac{4\pi\varepsilon_0}{e^2} = \dfrac{n^2h^2\varepsilon_0}{\pi me^2}

12.3.3 Step 3: Putting in numbers, the Bohr radius

In rn=n2ℏ2/mke2r_n = n^2\hbar^2/mke^2, everything except n2n^2 is a fixed constant of nature, so it pays to evaluate that part once. It is the radius of the n=1n=1 orbit, called the Bohr radius, a0a_0:

a0=ℏ2mke2a_0 = \dfrac{\hbar^2}{mke^2}

Using ℏ=1.0546×10−34 J s\hbar = 1.0546\times10^{-34}\text{ J s}, m=9.109×10−31 kgm = 9.109\times10^{-31}\text{ kg}, k=8.988×109 N m2C−2k = 8.988\times10^{9}\text{ N m}^2\text{C}^{-2}, and e=1.602×10−19 Ce = 1.602\times10^{-19}\text{ C}, work out the top and the bottom separately:

ℏ2=(1.0546×10−34)2=1.1122×10−68\hbar^2 = (1.0546\times10^{-34})^2 = 1.1122\times10^{-68}mke2=(9.109×10−31)(8.988×109)(1.602×10−19)2=2.1012×10−58mke^2 = (9.109\times10^{-31})(8.988\times10^{9})(1.602\times10^{-19})^2 = 2.1012\times10^{-58}a0=1.1122×10−682.1012×10−58=5.293×10−11 m=0.5293 A˚a_0 = \dfrac{1.1122\times10^{-68}}{2.1012\times10^{-58}} = 5.293\times10^{-11}\text{ m} = 0.5293\ \text{\AA}

(The units do come out as metres: J² s² divided by kg × N m² C⁻² × C² reduces to m, using 1 J = 1 N m and 1 N = 1 kg m s⁻².) Every other orbit is just n2n^2 times this:

Bohr orbit radius
rn=n2a0=n2×0.529 A˚r_n = n^2a_0 = n^2 \times 0.529\ \text{\AA}

The same constants give the ground-state speed, v1=ke2/ℏv_1 = ke^2/\hbar:

v1=(8.988×109)(1.602×10−19)21.0546×10−34=2.3067×10−281.0546×10−34=2.187×106 m/sv_1 = \dfrac{(8.988\times10^{9})(1.602\times10^{-19})^2}{1.0546\times10^{-34}} = \dfrac{2.3067\times10^{-28}}{1.0546\times10^{-34}} = 2.187\times10^{6}\text{ m/s}

Fast, but still under 1% of the speed of light (about c/137c/137), which is why ordinary Newtonian mechanics was good enough in Step 1.

12.3.4 Step 4: Kinetic, potential, and total energy

Kinetic energy. Divide the force balance mv2r=ke2mv^2r = ke^2 by rr to get mv2=ke2/rmv^2 = ke^2/r, then take half of it:

K=12mv2=12⋅ke2r=ke22rK = \tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{ke^2}{r} = \dfrac{ke^2}{2r}

Potential energy. Two point charges q1q_1 and q2q_2 at separation rr have electrostatic potential energy kq1q2/rkq_1q_2/r, taking zero at infinite separation. Here q1=+eq_1 = +e (proton) and q2=−eq_2 = -e (electron):

U=k(+e)(−e)r=−ke2rU = \dfrac{k(+e)(-e)}{r} = -\dfrac{ke^2}{r}

Total energy. Add the two, writing ke2/rke^2/r as 2ke2/2r2ke^2/2r so both terms share a denominator:

E=K+U=ke22r−2ke22rE = K + U = \dfrac{ke^2}{2r} - \dfrac{2ke^2}{2r}
Total energy in an orbit of radius r
E=−ke22r\textcolor{#e08a1e}{E} = -\dfrac{ke^2}{2r}

Compare the three: E=−KE = -K and U=2EU = 2E. The kinetic energy is positive, the potential energy is twice as big and negative, and the total comes out negative, exactly the pattern found for a satellite in the Gravitation chapter, because both are inverse-square attractions.

12.3.5 Step 5: Substituting the radius to get the energy levels

The energy still depends on rr, but Step 2 says only the radii rnr_n are allowed. Substitute rn=n2ℏ2/mke2r_n = n^2\hbar^2/mke^2:

En=−ke22rn=−ke22×1rn=−ke22×mke2n2ℏ2E_n = -\dfrac{ke^2}{2r_n} = -\dfrac{ke^2}{2}\times\dfrac{1}{r_n} = -\dfrac{ke^2}{2}\times\dfrac{mke^2}{n^2\hbar^2}

(again, dividing by rnr_n means multiplying by its reciprocal). The two factors of ke2ke^2 multiply to give k2e4k^2e^4:

Energy of the n-th level
En=−mk2e42ℏ2⋅1n2\textcolor{#e08a1e}{E_n} = -\dfrac{mk^2e^4}{2\hbar^2}\cdot\dfrac{1}{n^2}

In the textbook’s notation, k2ℏ2=1/16π2ε02h2/4π2=14ε02h2\dfrac{k^2}{\hbar^2} = \dfrac{1/16\pi^2\varepsilon_0^2}{h^2/4\pi^2} = \dfrac{1}{4\varepsilon_0^2h^2}, so this is the same as En=−me48ε02h2n2E_n = -\dfrac{me^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2h^2n^2}.

The fraction in front is just the size of the ground-state energy, and the quickest way to evaluate it is to notice that at n=1n=1 the energy is −ke2/2a0-ke^2/2a_0, using ke2ke^2 and a0a_0 already worked out in Step 3:

E1=−ke22a0=−2.3067×10−282(5.293×10−11)=−2.179×10−18 JE_1 = -\dfrac{ke^2}{2a_0} = -\dfrac{2.3067\times10^{-28}}{2(5.293\times10^{-11})} = -2.179\times10^{-18}\text{ J}

Dividing by 1.602×10−191.602\times10^{-19} J per eV:

E1=−2.179×10−181.602×10−19 eV=−13.60 eVE_1 = -\dfrac{2.179\times10^{-18}}{1.602\times10^{-19}}\text{ eV} = -13.60\text{ eV}

and therefore, for every level:

Bohr energy levels
En=−13.6n2 eVE_n = -\dfrac{13.6}{n^2}\ \text{eV}

The negative sign reflects that the electron is bound to the nucleus; more energy is needed to free it from lower (more negative) levels. As n→∞n \to \infty, rn→∞r_n \to \infty and En→0E_n \to 0: the electron is essentially free, at rest infinitely far away. That is the ionisation limit, and 13.6 eV is therefore the ionisation energy of hydrogen: the minimum energy needed to remove the electron entirely, starting from the ground state. In short: rn∝n2r_n \propto n^2, vn∝1/nv_n \propto 1/n, and En∝−1/n2E_n \propto -1/n^2.

Worked example

Everything about the n = 4 orbit, from the derived formulas

For a hydrogen electron in the n = 4 orbit, find the orbit radius, the speed, and the kinetic, potential, and total energy, then check the total against −13.6/n2-13.6/n^2.

Radius and speed, from rn=n2a0r_n = n^2a_0 and vn=v1/nv_n = v_1/n:

r4=42(5.293×10−11)=8.469×10−10 mr_4 = 4^2(5.293\times10^{-11}) = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{8.469\times10^{-10}\text{ m}}v4=2.187×1064=5.468×105 m/sv_4 = \dfrac{2.187\times10^{6}}{4} = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{5.468\times10^{5}\text{ m/s}}

Kinetic energy, from K=ke2/2rK = ke^2/2r:

K=2.3067×10−282(8.469×10−10)=1.362×10−19 J=0.850 eVK = \dfrac{2.3067\times10^{-28}}{2(8.469\times10^{-10})} = 1.362\times10^{-19}\text{ J} = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{0.850\text{ eV}}

Cross-check with 12mv2\tfrac{1}{2}mv^2 directly, using the speed above:

12mv42=12(9.109×10−31)(5.468×105)2=1.362×10−19 J\tfrac{1}{2}mv_4^2 = \tfrac{1}{2}(9.109\times10^{-31})(5.468\times10^{5})^2 = 1.362\times10^{-19}\text{ J}

Potential energy, from U=−ke2/rU = -ke^2/r, and then the total:

U=−2.3067×10−288.469×10−10=−2.724×10−19 J=−1.700 eVU = -\dfrac{2.3067\times10^{-28}}{8.469\times10^{-10}} = -2.724\times10^{-19}\text{ J} = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{-1.700\text{ eV}}E=K+U=0.850−1.700=−0.850 eVE = K + U = 0.850 - 1.700 = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{-0.850\text{ eV}}

Exactly −13.6/42=−0.850-13.6/4^2 = -0.850 eV, the n = 4 entry in the table in §12.4 below. The orbit is 16 times wider than the ground-state orbit, but the electron travels round it at only a quarter of the speed.

12.4 Energy Levels & Transitions

A natural first guess is that energy levels should be evenly spaced, or even spread further apart as n increases. The opposite is true. Because En∝−1/n2E_n \propto -1/n^2, the gap between consecutive levels shrinks as n grows:

Level nEₙ (eV)Gap from level below
1−13.6000—
2−3.400010.2000 eV
3−1.51111.8889 eV
4−0.85000.6611 eV
5−0.54400.3060 eV
6−0.37780.1662 eV

The rungs of the ladder crowd together higher up, converging toward (but never reaching, at any finite n) the ionisation limit at E = 0. See the interactive energy-level simulation for the live version, with the levels drawn at their true, shrinking-gap positions.

Worked example

Photon energy and wavelength for a transition

An electron falls from n=4 to n=2. Find the photon energy and its wavelength.

E=E4−E2=(−0.8500)−(−3.4000)=2.5500 eVE = E_4 - E_2 = (-0.8500) - (-3.4000) = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{2.5500\text{ eV}}

Using E(eV) = 1240/λ(nm):

λ=12402.5500≈486.3 nm\lambda = \dfrac{1240}{2.5500} \approx \textcolor{#e08a1e}{486.3\text{ nm}}

This is the H-beta line, the second line of the Balmer series, visible as blue-green light.

12.5 Spectral Series

Every possible downward transition in hydrogen falls into one of several named series, grouped by which level the electron lands on:

12.5.1 Lyman series — final level n=1

Ultraviolet. Includes n=2→1, n=3→1, n=4→1, and so on.

12.5.2 Balmer series — final level n=2

The only series with visible lines (n=3→2 is red, n=4→2 is blue-green, and so on), which is why it was discovered first, historically.

12.5.3 Paschen series — final level n=3

Infrared. Includes n=4→3, n=5→3, n=6→3, and so on.

Within any one series, successive lines (n=3→2, then n=4→2, then n=5→2, …) get closer and closer together as the starting level increases, for exactly the same reason the energy levels themselves bunch up: the lines pile up toward a sharp series limit, the wavelength of a transition from n=∞n=\infty down to that series’ final level.

Worked example

The Balmer series limit

Find the series limit (shortest wavelength, i.e. highest energy line) of the Balmer series.

This corresponds to a transition from n=∞n=\infty down to n=2:

Elimit=E∞−E2=0−(−3.4000)=3.4000 eVE_{\text{limit}} = E_\infty - E_2 = 0 - (-3.4000) = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{3.4000\text{ eV}}λlimit=12403.4000≈364.7 nm\lambda_{\text{limit}} = \dfrac{1240}{3.4000} \approx \textcolor{#e08a1e}{364.7\text{ nm}}

Every other Balmer line has a longer wavelength than this, and they crowd closer and closer to 364.7 nm as the starting level climbs higher.

12.6 Limitations of the Bohr Model

The Bohr model gives excellent agreement with experiment, but only for hydrogen and other single-electron (hydrogen-like) ions such as He⁺ or Li²⁺. The moment a second electron is present, electron-electron repulsion shifts the energy levels in ways this simple picture cannot account for. The model also offers no explanation for why angular momentum should be quantised in the first place, that had to wait for full quantum mechanics (de Broglie’s matter waves and the Schrödinger equation), and it cannot explain the finer details of spectral lines, such as their relative intensities or splitting in a magnetic field.

— From the NCERT exercises

Two of the chapter’s own exercise questions, with original worked solutions, both built directly on the results derived step by step in §12.3.

NCERT Exercise 12.4

The ground state energy of hydrogen atom is –13.6 eV. What are the kinetic and potential energies of the electron in this state?

Solution

Step 4 of §12.3 showed that in every Bohr orbit, K=−EK = -E and U=2EU = 2E. With E1=−13.6E_1 = -13.6 eV:

K=−E1=−(−13.6)=13.6 eVK = -E_1 = -(-13.6) = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{13.6\text{ eV}}U=2E1=2(−13.6)=−27.2 eVU = 2E_1 = 2(-13.6) = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{-27.2\text{ eV}}

Check: K+U=13.6−27.2=−13.6K + U = 13.6 - 27.2 = -13.6 eV, the total we started with.

NCERT Exercise 12.6

(a) Using the Bohr's model calculate the speed of the electron in a hydrogen atom in the n = 1, 2, and 3 levels. (b) Calculate the orbital period in each of these levels.

Solution

(a) Step 2 of §12.3 gave vn=ke2/nℏ=v1/nv_n = ke^2/n\hbar = v_1/n, and Step 3 worked out v1=2.187×106v_1 = 2.187\times10^{6} m/s:

v1=2.19×106 m/sv_1 = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{2.19\times10^{6}\text{ m/s}}v2=v12=1.09×106 m/s,v3=v13=7.29×105 m/sv_2 = \dfrac{v_1}{2} = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{1.09\times10^{6}\text{ m/s}}, \qquad v_3 = \dfrac{v_1}{3} = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{7.29\times10^{5}\text{ m/s}}

(b) One revolution means covering the circumference 2πrn2\pi r_n at speed vnv_n, so Tn=2πrn/vnT_n = 2\pi r_n/v_n. Substituting rn=n2a0r_n = n^2a_0 and vn=v1/nv_n = v_1/n:

Tn=2π(n2a0)v1/n=n3×2πa0v1T_n = \dfrac{2\pi(n^2a_0)}{v_1/n} = n^3\times\dfrac{2\pi a_0}{v_1}T1=2π(5.293×10−11)2.187×106=1.52×10−16 sT_1 = \dfrac{2\pi(5.293\times10^{-11})}{2.187\times10^{6}} = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{1.52\times10^{-16}\text{ s}}T2=23 T1=1.22×10−15 s,T3=33 T1=4.11×10−15 sT_2 = 2^3\,T_1 = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{1.22\times10^{-15}\text{ s}}, \qquad T_3 = 3^3\,T_1 = \textcolor{#e08a1e}{4.11\times10^{-15}\text{ s}}

The period grows as n3n^3: an orbit n2n^2 times longer, travelled nn times more slowly. The NCERT answer key lists the speeds as 2.18×10⁶, 1.09×10⁶ and 7.27×10⁵ m/s; the small differences in the last figure come only from rounding of the constants. The periods agree exactly.

Want the interactive version instead? Try the energy-level simulation → or take a practice paper →